RevPAR
Revenue per available room — ADR × occupancy.
why we askThe only number that catches the trade-off between price and fill.
Nights you rented back from an OTANights you sold yourself
A 120-room property at 68% occupancy, 70% of it booked through OTAs. Not your numbers — put yours in below. Base commission 15–18%, Genius discounts funded by you, Preferred Partner on top. HSMAI puts total acquisition cost at 15–25% of guest-paid revenue.
A 30-URL bilingual hotel site · 150 photographs · 24 machine-readable amenities · zero third-party scripts · open view-source and count it yourself.
Not the commission rate. The annual figure — the one that never arrives as an invoice, so it never gets challenged.
Four numbers you already know. One you have probably never been shown as a single figure — because no invoice ever arrives for it.
The counterweight, and it is not ours: across 125 million reservations at 44,500 hotels, SiteMinder found the average direct booking worth US$519 against US$320 through an OTA. Direct guests book longer and cancel less.
This is your number, not an industry average. Change the inputs — nothing here is sent anywhere.
The ledger uses what you typed. The audit uses what your property actually does — your channel mix, your rate parity, whether the OTAs are bidding on your own name. It is free and you keep the findings.
FREE QUOTE + SITE SCAN
Which is why the season you did not sell is never their problem, and always yours.
Roughly ninety per cent of North Coast operations close from October to May. A retainer billed flat across twelve months spends its heaviest months on an empty property and its lightest on the weeks that pay for the year.
Above 70–75% occupancy on a date, the right move is to close channels, not buy demand. Paying 18% to sell a room that would have sold anyway is the most expensive habit in hospitality distribution, and it is invisible in a monthly report.
A hospitality account is won or lost on whether the agency understands what the numbers mean. Here is the vocabulary we will use in the first call — and what we are actually trying to learn from each one.
Revenue per available room — ADR × occupancy.
why we askThe only number that catches the trade-off between price and fill.
Average daily rate actually achieved.
why we askDiscounting into occupancy shows up here first.
Revenue generated index against your comp set. 100 = fair share.
why we askBelow 100 means the market is fine and you are losing it to someone specific.
Market penetration index — your share of occupancy.
why we askTells us whether the gap is a demand problem.
Average rate index — your rate against the set.
why we askTells us whether the gap is a pricing problem instead.
Total revenue per available room, F&B and spa included.
why we askDirect guests spend more on property. This is where that shows.
Gross operating profit per available room.
why we askCommission is an operating cost. This is the line it lands on.
Rate after commission, fees and discounts.
why we askThe gap between ADR and net ADR is the whole argument of this page.
Bookings on the books versus the same point last year.
why we askIt is the only early warning a property gets.
Dates running behind pace.
why we askWhere the media should point, instead of running flat all year.
Whether your own site shows the same rate as the OTAs.
why we askIf your site is more expensive, direct cannot win. Reportedly true of 63% of GCC properties — we check yours.
Blocks that never materialise, in groups and allotments.
why we askIt quietly ruins a forecast, and it is rarely modelled.
What is your RGI against your comp set — and is the gap in MPI or ARI?
Four things a resort needs that a general marketing agency does not build.
A site that answers the only two questions a guest has — is it available, what does it cost — and hands off cleanly to your engine. On Matarma the engine is Kwentra, third-party. We built everything around it and fixed what it got wrong. We do not sell a booking engine we own, because we do not own one.
Shot per room type, not as brand mood. Expedia's own guidance to hoteliers is that poor imagery is the most common reason a traveller rules a property out, and roughly half rule one out over incomplete amenity detail. A guest is asking what they will wake up in.
Gulf Arabic and Egyptian Arabic are different registers to different buyers. German, Russian and Polish arrive on different charter schedules with different booking windows. Which of them you need comes out of your arrivals data, not a menu.
Google Hotel Ads and metasearch read live rates straight out of an engine. If nothing is connected, the OTAs bid on your own property name and you pay commission for a guest who was already looking for you.
Matarma Beach Residence — built, photographed and run by us. Everything below is checkable without asking us for anything.
Expedia's own guidance to hoteliers is blunt about it: poor imagery is the single most common reason a traveller rules a property out, and roughly half rule one out for incomplete amenity detail. Brand mood shots do not answer the question a guest is actually asking, which is what will I wake up in.






























30 of 150 frames · shot, graded and delivered by us · the full set is live on the property's own gallery
Not a testimonial. Not a percentage. A list of things that exist, each with the exact instruction for confirming it yourself — on the live property, right now, without asking us for anything.
What is deliberately not on this list
Bookings, revenue, ROI, conversion rate, traffic growth and search rankings. Matarma books through Kwentra, a third-party engine with no API, no webhook and no export — so we have never been shown a booking number, and an agency that quotes one it cannot see is quoting one it invented. The property's own analytics only began in July 2026 and the domain moved in August, so there is no clean before to compare against either.
We will tell you exactly the same thing about your property, in the first call, before you pay us anything.
Deliverables, not outcomes. Every step ends in a thing that exists.
Where every booking came from last year, what each channel actually cost after commission and discount, and whether your own site is quoting higher than the OTAs. You keep this whether or not you hire us.
The site, the flow into your engine, the WhatsApp desk, the structured data. Fixed scope, fixed date, agreed before anything starts.
Photography per room type and the language versions your arrivals data justifies — not every language, the ones that book.
Campaigns pointed at the surface you now own, weighted to the pre-season window and your need dates rather than spread flat across a year.
No step above promises a booking, a ranking or a percentage. If an agency's ninety-day plan contains one, ask which instrument they intend to measure it with.
An hour of your time, nothing to pay, and you keep the findings whatever you decide.
If I find nothing, you have lost an hour.
No deck, no discovery phase, no retainer conversation until there is something worth retaining us for.
FREE QUOTE + SITE SCAN
Including the ones about what we will not claim, and why.
No, and any agency that does is selling you something. OTAs are the best demand-harvesting machine ever built and they will fill rooms you cannot fill yourself, especially in a soft season. The argument is about mix, not exit. A property at 70% OTA and a property at 45% OTA sell the same rooms — one of them keeps a great deal more of the money.
Properties that invest properly in their own site and email commonly reach 30–40% direct. If you are starting near 10%, getting to 20% inside a year is already materially profitable — and that is the framing we work to. We will not promise you a percentage, because the levers include your rates, your season and your comp set, and most of those are not ours to move.
Yes, and anyone who quotes direct as free is not worth hiring. Payment fees, the booking engine, the ad click — realistically 4–5% all-in. The case is the spread against 15–25%, not a fantasy of zero.
Parity clauses vary by contract and by market, and several jurisdictions have narrowed them. In practice the bigger problem is the opposite: many properties are accidentally more expensive on their own site than on the OTA, which makes direct booking impossible to win. That is one of the first things the audit checks on your property.
Yes. The guest-facing discount is funded by the property, and it sits on top of base commission. Preferred Partner adds more again. That stack is exactly what the ledger at the top of this page lets you watch climb.